Note
AI Overviews and what they did to clicks
The short version: informational content lost a great deal, commercial local search lost comparatively little, and that gap should decide where you spend.
Published
What actually changed
AI Overviews answer the question on the results page. When one appears, a meaningful share of people who would have clicked through no longer need to, and measured zero-click rates have risen substantially over the last two years.
The effect is not evenly distributed. It falls hardest on general explainer content, the sort of article that answers a question in three paragraphs, because that is exactly what an overview can reproduce.
Local commercial search is far less affected
Overviews appear on a much smaller proportion of local searches. When somebody searches for a service near them, Google still answers with a map, businesses, reviews and phone numbers, because that is what the searcher wants and an overview cannot replace it.
For a Perth service business, that is the strategically important fact. The searches that produce your enquiries are the most defensible part of the current landscape.
What we changed as a result
We stopped recommending general informational content as a traffic strategy. A guide explaining what a meta description is has almost no path to an enquiry now, and it never had a strong one.
What still works is content with a commercial edge: what something costs, how to choose a supplier, why a specific thing went wrong. Those searches are made by people with a budget and a problem, and an overview summarising the answer often increases rather than removes the need to talk to somebody.